Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and also case legislation at both the federal and state levels.
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by law." It truly is effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents of the boy or Lady will not approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they can Reduce off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the few is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by law.
The plenty of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made distinct that police is free to just take action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. In the event the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-discipline duties during the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners could find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Though there is not any prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds minor sway. Still, if there is no precedent during the home state, relevant case legislation from another state might be thought of because of the court.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, while it mentions large multi-tenant properties in a few context, it is actually actually rather imprecise about whether the 90-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based within the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to the 90-working day notice requirement, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
The legislation as established in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Case law, also used interchangeably with common legislation, can be a legislation that is based on precedents, that could be the judicial decisions from previous cases, alternatively than law based on constitutions, statutes, or more info regulations. Case law uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court could interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to make it appropriate to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified from the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually very well-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. If the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the ninety times for your department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided from the decision of the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided by the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there may very well be a single or more judgments given (or reported). Only the reason with the decision in the majority can represent a binding precedent, but all can be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could possibly be adopted in an argument.
Therefore, this petition is found to be not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may possibly request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more